PHPStorm + CodeSniffer: check Kohana coding style on-the-fly
  • rsukharrsukhar

    Hi all!

    Guys, check out this feature:

    http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/03/checking-your-code-with-php-code-sniffer-in-phpstorm-4-0/

    It will be availible at PHPStorm 4.0 which early release can be downloaded here

    http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/WI/Web+IDE+EAP

    PHP Codesniffer standard for the Kohana is still located at

    https://github.com/kohana/coding-standards

    Right now I can't check out if this combination works (got a lot of stuff to do).

    So if someone would check it, thank you!

  • AkkiAkki

    I'm sure when it's going to be important enough for you, you'll find the time to check it out yourself.

    If you don't care about it, don't you think we care even less about it. =P

  • rsukharrsukhar

    Akki, you don't get the main idea!

    Today I accidentally found out very interesting feature. I wrote here not trying to persuade anyone (especially you) to check it for me. No. I wrote to share with everyone.

    In every my post you are looking for negative side, not positive. What's the problem with you?

  • AkkiAkki

    So the thread is about the IDE?

  • HarraldHarrald

    Thanks for sharing :) Still have to give PHPStorm a good look. It has got some really nice features which i really enjoyed in visual studio(c#) but have to do without in eclipse(php).

    Last time i gave it a chance was on Windows and i hated that PHPStorm didn't used the OS native file browser. Thinks like mounted network drive where not accessible. But as i mentioned i still have to give it a real chance.

  • AkkiAkki

    Does storm support PHP5.4 at the moment?

  • brandonsbrandons

    @Akki The current version (3.0) doesn't support PHP 5.4 but version 4.0 (which is what @rsukhar is talking about) will. You can see more information about this on their roadmap.

  • zomborzombor

    <troll>Why does an editor need to support a specific version of a language?</troll>

  • AkkiAkki

    @zombor

    Currently PHP5.4 is a labeled as so called "stable". Since this is a payed editor I wanted to know if it's at least keeping up better then the free editors out there (some of which do support 5.4 already). Also it's support of the language, in general, is much more important then it's support for X, Y, Z framework-helper-something.

    @brandons

    Thanks for the link.

  • rsukharrsukhar

    @Akki, have a look, it has Opensource license

  • AkkiAkki

    @rsukhar that's interesting, thanks.

    Probably won't use that option though, not a big fan of "open/free; with strings attached". I mean, for example there, who doesn't have private projects? the agreement seems incredibly idealistic in that sense--can they sue me if I accidentally open a non-open source piece of code? Things like that, too many hoops and loose ends. Well I'm also someone who looks at a script to poll for file changes and run something as trivial...

    #!/usr/bin/env ruby
# encoding: utf-8
# coding: utf-8

# rubygems
begin
    require 'rubygems'
    required_gems = ['fssm']
    required_gems.each do |gem|
        begin
            Gem::Specification::find_by_name gem
            require gem
        rescue Gem::LoadError
            puts " Error. Try: gem install #{gem}"
            Process.exit
        end
    end#each
rescue
    puts " Error. Try: gem update --system"
    Process.exit
end

# watch
FSSM.monitor('.') do

    create do |relative_path, absolute_path|
        puts "#{absolute_path} created"
    end

    update do |relative_path, absolute_path|
        puts "#{absolute_path} changed"
    end

end#FSSM

    ..so none of it's features really impress me that much; don't mean that in a bad sense, basically they don't have anything I would need that everyone else doesn't have already.

Add a Comment